|
||||
|
Slackware versus Mandrake
I've been debating about which of these Linuxes to try.
Mandrake is supposed to be good for Linux newbies, and has a easy installer with a friendly GUI. There are screenshots here. Slackware I heard is also pretty good. Actually, I even tried installing it yesterday, but the setup was really a pain, and now whenever I want to boot it up, I have to use a boot disk (I guess I must have done something wrong during the installation). So, I guess this is not really for newbies. I am not completely new to Linux; I have been using Xandros for a while, and it's pretty good. Anyway, you can see some screenshots here. So I am going to try Mandrake Linux, and I am confident that I will like it. I already ordered it from OSDisc.com last week, and it should be arriving in the mail very soon. But I still want your opinion on which is better (just for home use).
Last edited by AwesomeSauce; 03-11-2005 at 04:35 PM. |
|
|||
|
On a side note, I assume you mean "Slackware versus Mandrake" in the topic?
As for the topic itself, I've never tried any Linux distribution than RedHat's seriously, but Mandrake has a reputation of being quite user friendly also. As for a recommendation, I'd have to fall back on Fedora Core Linux. It's user friendly, widely supported and has a quite big userbase (which means a lot of support). One thing does confuse me. Why did you order the CD? You could just download the ISO from mandrakelinux.com and burn it yourself, no?
|
|
|||
|
I have never tried Linux at all but I am very very very curious in learning and trying it out. Is it hard to learn? Even mandrake? This may be a dumb question but heck I don't know, can you leave XP installed in case you install Linux and have no idea how to work it? What are the downsides? Can programs like Adobe Photoshop work on it? Does it start up sort of like Windows XP or do you have to type in commands? If you know a site that can teach you how to run and work with the OS (sort of like an instruction manual) I'd appreciate if you post it. I really like learning new things. hehe
|
|
||||
|
As I'm only familiar with Fedora Core Linux, I'll write this post from my experience with Fedora Core. This means it may not be appliable to every Linux distribution.
Quote:
Linux would never tell you "I need to restart." or "I need these upgrades." You'll have to figure that out for yourself. In other words, it doesn't patronize you, but it does ask some additional tasks. ![]() Quote:
This is not very hard to do, as the Linux installation will ask you what it should do with the Windows partition. It can automatically install and configure a boot menu for you where you can pick if you want to start Linux or Windows. Funny enough, the Windows installation will tell you it cannot be installed on a computer where there is already Linux. ![]() So you'll have to install Windows first if you are going to do this. Another problem is that you can't really safely partition your harddisk when there is already data on it. If you have a second harddisk, that would be great for Linux. If you only have one, you'll most likely have to wipe it to install Linux dualboot. Quote:
Programs made for Windows will not run (unless you emulate them, but that is somewhat silly). However, this does not mean that you cannot use Linux to edit photos or write documents. Linux has it's own solutions for these things, such as OpenOffice and Gimp. Some advantages: - Linux comes with a lot of preinstalled software. If you don't like the default media player, pick another. If you want to play some game, pick one out of the fifty it installs. - Linux can be customized entirely. The default desktop theme is nice, but you could always get creative - Linux is an opensource platform, as is most software developed for it. This means most (not all, though) software developed for Linux is free, has a lot of support and a lot of unofficial patches and modifications available. Some disadvantages: - Compatibility. Linux does not support Windows software, nor does Windows support Linux software. This sometimes means you can't use the software of your choice, but Linux does have lots of alternatives for software solutions. - Difficulty. Linux can be quite difficult sometimes, but the benefit is that Linux always gives clear error messages - which makes it easy to find the problem, but even easier to go to Google and just read the solution. Quote:
Hope this helps.
|
|
||||
|
I remember when I first tried Xandros. It was easy, because I only had to download one ISO and burn it onto one CD. Then I had to make a boot floppy for it because the old computer I was going to install it on couldn't boot from a CD. I had to restart the computer with the CD and the floppy in it, and then there was an easy installation and I guess that's about all it took. But with some Linux distributions you have to burn several CDs.
So I am very interested in Linux too, and I'm very curious, that's why I like to try several different kinds. However, I never really learned to use what apperantly is a very important part of Linux: the command prompt. It would probably be a good thing to learn how to use it if you use Linux often. I'll have to search for a site somewhere that teaches it. I don't think Photoshop will work with it; however, I know a good free alternative will work with it called The GIMP. There are many good, free programs that you can download the sources of and compile on Linux. By the way, I think I am going to try Fedora Core 3. Everyone is saying good things about it, so I'd might as well. Last edited by AwesomeSauce; 03-11-2005 at 06:00 PM. |
|
|||
|
Thanks for the information DJHyperbyte and AwesomeSauce. It is really helpful and I appreciate the time you took in answering. I have an old computer I don't use anymore but it is still usable just not for games and high memory demanding programs so I'm going to probably reformat it and use it to test Linux, probably Fedora since it apparently sounds really good and before that though I'll read up and gather as much information as I can on it and learn the most I can. One thing though. I take it I won't be able to connect to the internet through it since my modem installation cd was made for Windows XP so I'll have to use my laptop for that I guess.
|
|
||||
|
The Fedora Download Instructions says "If you are already running Linux, you can save an ISO image to a directory on your machine or another machine on the network. You may then mount the ISO image to look at or copy files." Do I have to do this, or is it optional?
What I was going to do is download the ISO images on a Windows machine (Actually it's downloading right now), burn the CDs and install it on another computer that doesn't have an internet connection. And how can I make a boot floppy to start the installation? or maybe it comes with the torrent that's downloading? Last edited by AwesomeSauce; 03-11-2005 at 06:58 PM. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() Since you're downloading a torrent, be aware of this: RedHat has a great amount of mirrors available. This means that you can often download the ISO's at full speed. I downloaded the four Fedora Core 3 installation disks in an hour or so using a mirror close to me. Look here for the complete list: http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors.html |
|
|||
|
One more question, when I go here and I go down to where it says Download the ISO images and click on the link, I see 10 files. I need to download them all? and run each one from a total of what looks like 9 cd's since I see 9 iso and then a file called md5sum?
Last edited by MiamiGuy; 03-11-2005 at 07:27 PM. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Topic: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Topic Tools | |
|
|
Similar Topics
|
||||
| Topic | Topic Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMSN Linux Mandrake? | JayBe123 | Windows Live Messenger Support | 3 | 03-26-2005 11:59 AM |
| booting from disk w/ slackware... | FirefoxMan | Computer Support Discussion | 1 | 11-09-2004 11:04 PM |
| questions about Slackware | FirefoxMan | Computer Support Discussion | 0 | 09-26-2004 07:54 PM |
| Burning Mandrake | ShadowSlayer469 | Computer Support Discussion | 30 | 05-28-2004 01:34 PM |
| Windows Messenger 4.7 versus MSN Messenger 6.1 | FF | MSN / WLM Archive | 1 | 12-23-2003 12:10 PM |